Why does rape generate stronger reactions and awaken a nation's conscience more often than other heinous crimes? Is it perhaps because it inflicts immense pain on the victim and their family? One might argue that this is also true for murder. Is it the fact that offenders derive pleasure from the victim's suffering that contributes to this disparity? Does this justify the death penalty? Should the validity of criminal laws be determined by public morality rather than constitutional morality? First of all, what is justice? These were some of the questions that had occupied my thoughts recently. Michael J. Sandel delves into the philosophical debate surrounding justice, highlighting three key concepts: maximizing welfare, respecting freedom, and promoting virtue. He contrasts ancient views, which tie justice to virtue and the best way of life, with modern perspectives that emphasize individual freedom and neutrality regarding moral values. Ultimately, Sandel suggests ...
A space where I reflect, summarize, and capture the essence of every book I read