"How To Win An Indian Election" offers a candid exposé of the intricate mechanisms that underpin electoral victories in India. The perspective presented resonates with insights from the article "Finding the Right Job for Your Product," which I studied during one of my courses at IIMU (though I cannot recall which one at the moment). That article argues that traditional methods of product positioning can often lead to a focus on inessential attributes and unnecessary customer demographics, rather than addressing the underlying "jobs" that consumers are trying to accomplish using a product. This narrow focus can trap companies into a fruitless pursuit of adding features that customers do not value and which competitors can easily replicate, leading to diminished profits and a failure to differentiate.
Similarly, Shivam Shankar Singh's central argument contends that Indian elections are less about governance and policy discussions and more about crafting compelling narratives and manipulating public perception. This focus on surface-level aspects, where the ends justify the means, can make political parties slaves to superficial promises and short-term gains, ultimately failing to address the deeper concerns of the electorate and long-term reforms. This, in turn, leads to diminished public trust and a failure to truly differentiate themselves from the opposition.
Drawing on his firsthand experiences as a political consultant at the grassroots level, Singh unveils a political landscape dominated by propaganda, data analytics, and a populace often swayed more by emotion than reason. He highlights the chasm between the lofty ideals of democracy and the ground reality of electoral politics, where winning often takes precedence over governance.
A cornerstone of Singh's analysis is the role of an informed electorate—or the lack thereof—in a functioning democracy. He argues that the success of political campaigns frequently hinges on the ability to create narratives that resonate with even the most apathetic voters. This observation underscores the power of branding and image-building in modern politics.
Singh critiques the functioning of the Indian Parliament, characterizing it as often more entertaining than effective. He supports this criticism by highlighting the frequent disruptions caused by opposition parties, which lead to significant time, work, and research being wasted. This inefficiency is further compounded by the side effects of the Anti-Defection Law of 1985, which forces MPs to vote in accordance with their party's interests, rendering their personal opinions and understanding of issues irrelevant.
Furthermore, he condemns voters, noting that instead of focusing on legislative performance or the history of bills that received a legislator's support, voters often evaluate representatives based on their ability to address local concerns—a task for which legislators often lack official powers to act.
Singh also sheds light on the flawed nature of the parliamentary question-hour system, where important matters are decided by a lottery-like ballot process. The scope for collusion, where multiple MPs combine similar questions to increase the likelihood of selection, creates an avenue for potential manipulation. This undermines the fairness of parliamentary debates and questions the effectiveness of the legislative process.
Another significant theme in the book is the role of branding in politics. Singh asserts that election narratives are often crafted retrospectively, with journalists and strategists highlighting selective events, leading to hindsight bias. Most successful politicians view developmental activities and interactions with constituents as tools to build their brand. A well-crafted brand can create the perception of a party or candidate as a frontrunner, which is crucial, especially for neutral voters. Failure to build a strong personal brand leaves space for opponents to define one negatively, using deceitful tactics to undermine thier competition's credibility.
Singh also explores the impact of the media, often referred to as the fourth estate, in shaping public perception. He quotes former Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev, who described the press as a "chief ideological weapon." The media's role in politics is not just about reporting events but also about framing narratives and influencing voter opinions. Many people choose sides based on consistent and popular rhetoric rather than careful examination of conflicting opinions. Singh cautions against the dangers of a media landscape driven more by market forces than by in-depth reporting and balanced coverage.
Singh provides multiple examples where, with the aid of publicly available data and sophisticated analytical tools, political campaigns employ multivariate testing and micro-targeting of voters with tailored messages. However, this data-driven precision is usually accompanied by a disregard for privacy and has been abused for the insidious spread of misinformation. Fake news, amplified by social media and driven by both political agendas and economic incentives, has transformed the media landscape into a battleground for public opinion. Singh cautions that the increasing commercialization of media, driven by market forces and operated more by corporates with political affiliations, has led to a decline in investigative journalism and a rise in sensationalism.
Singh highlights how fake news creates a vicious cycle, where the incumbent's use of fake news forces the opposition to employ similar tactics. This shift has not only eroded public trust but also distorted political discourse, diverting attention from substantive issues toward divisive and emotionally charged narratives.
The ultimate goal of politicians, according to Singh's personal observations, is electoral success. While there may be instances where this goal aligns with genuine public service, these are always secondary to the primary objective of winning elections. Advancement within political parties often necessitates cultivating relationships with senior leaders and influential figures, creating a hierarchical structure characterized by deference, loyalty, and sycophancy. This dynamic inhibits critical feedback and fosters a culture where dissenting opinions are discouraged, potentially leading to an echo chamber effect and suboptimal decision-making.
On the subject of identity politics, Singh posits that in India, it serves as a potent tool for both political mobilization and social empowerment. By constructing a shared narrative of marginalization and victimhood, politicians can galvanize specific demographic groups into cohesive voting blocs.
The formation of these identity-based groups, Singh explains, is a strategic response to a bureaucratic system that often disregards the concerns of individual citizens. By banding together under a shared identity, marginalized communities can amplify their collective voice and exert pressure on political elites. This dynamic has led to significant policy changes and increased representation for previously underprivileged groups. However, over-reliance on identity politics can exacerbate social divisions and hinder the formation of coalitions based on broader interests. Furthermore, it can create a dependency culture, where communities become reliant on government patronage rather than pursuing self-sufficiency.
Singh also argues that to transcend the limitations of identity politics, it is not enough to rely on legislation or interventions by the Election Commission. Instead, he hopes for real change to come when individuals, rather than their ascribed social identities, are empowered with a strong voice in governance to assert their rights.
The book discusses the diminishing space for political consultancy firms like I-PAC (Indian Political Action Committee), which are not only competing with other consultants in the market but also increasingly facing competition from political parties themselves, which are developing in-house capabilities for campaign tasks. This vertical integration reduces reliance on external consultants, driven by concerns of overpayment and data security. Parties recognize the benefits of directly employing consultants, offering them financial stability and deeper involvement in campaigns. This shift is prompting consultants to reevaluate their roles and move away from traditional electoral politics.
Corruption, according to Singh, is both a consequence of voter temperament and political greed. The power dynamic between politicians and the average voter often involves a transactional exchange: votes for limited benefits. Politicians leverage this relationship to maintain power, which simultaneously necessitates their reliance on the financial backing of crony capitalists to fund their campaigns and patronage networks. These corrupt businessmen, in turn, benefit from preferential access to public resources and contracts. Breaking this cycle necessitates a two-pronged approach: improving the delivery of government services to reduce reliance on politicians for basic needs and empowering voters economically to reduce their vulnerability to manipulation.
Singh also touches upon the challenges faced by new political parties in gaining a foothold in the electoral landscape. Despite the desire for systemic change, the dominance of incumbent parties often prevents new entrants from creating the perception that they have a reasonable chance of winning. Voters typically exhibit a preference for established political parties with a proven electoral record, which consequently limits the appeal of emerging alternatives and reinforces the status quo.
Additionally, the dependence of top-level politicians on grassroots party workers creates a systemic challenge to improving governance. These workers, often integral to a party's electoral success, are inherently resistant to efficient systems, as such reforms could diminish their influence in the long run. Overcoming this hurdle requires sustained efforts from individuals committed to systemic change.
Contrary to popular belief, a party's ideology, often projected as central to political discourse, has limited practical impact on governance. In reality, the imperative to win elections demands a focus on specific communities and their needs, often overshadowing ideological principles. Consequently, the notion of an inherently "good" party becomes elusive, making voter choices a complex calculus of lesser evils.
Lastly, Singh elucidates that the right way to choose a party is to evaluate which party's rhetoric and actions are the least offensive to us so that we can stay with it long enough to reach a position of influence to bring about change while hoping that the good trickles down to the bottom. To effect meaningful change, a critical mass of qualified and idealistic individuals must be willing to enter the political arena. However, the corrosive influence of the political system raises questions about whether such individuals can maintain their integrity and aspirations upon assuming positions of power. As Abraham Lincoln wisely noted, "Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man’s character, give him power."
Comments
Post a Comment